翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v AM ・ R v Andrews ・ R v Asante-Mensah ・ R v Askov ・ R v Attorney General for England and Wales ・ R v B ・ R v B (KG) ・ R v Badger ・ R v Bailey ・ R v Baillie ・ R v Barger ・ R v Bartle ・ R v Basi ・ R v Beaulac ・ R v Belnavis ・ R v Betts and Ridley ・ R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd ・ R v Birmingham City Council, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission ・ R v Blaue ・ R v Bonjon ・ R v Boucher ・ R v Bourke ・ R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3) ・ R v Bowden ・ R v Brown ・ R v Bryan ・ R v Brydges Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Betts and Ridley ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Betts and Ridley ''R v Betts and Ridley'' (1930) 22 Cr App R 148 is a landmark case in English criminal law from 1930, which established that to be convicted of a crime under the doctrine of Common purpose, it was not necessary for an accessory to actually be present when the offence was carried out. ==Facts== Victor Betts and Herbert Ridley agreed to rob a man, William Thomas Andrews, as he was on his way to the bank. Their plan was that Betts would push the individual to the ground and snatch his bag. Meanwhile Ridley would be waiting around the corner in a getaway car. However, Betts struck Andrews with such force that he died as a result of the blow. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Betts and Ridley」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.